Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:14

Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Most-complete Stegosaur skull ever found forces rewrite of dinosaur history - Earth.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
UNAIDS Executive Director: ‘The HIV Response Is in Crisis’ - Bloomberg.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Inbox: This will be a tough roster to crack - Green Bay Packers
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Verizon announces wild new offer to win back angry customers - TheStreet
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Terraforming Mars Isn’t Sci-Fi Anymore – Here’s What It Would Take - SciTechDaily
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
What causes you to be tired all the time and major headaches?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Reality TV star’s son dead at 16: ‘Life is so cruel and unfair’ - AL.com